π΅πΆβ
Monday, 25 November 2019 20:04![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So I have my materials and notes for a longer post about EM fields and I'm wondering just where I should start, what level of basic knowledge would make it the most enjoyable reading experience.
I could actually start with the science of it, but is there anyone so tech-illiterate among the TF fans who'd actually need that? Or would it just be patronising?
no subject
Date: 25/11/19 18:30 (UTC)Granted, considering this fandom, I might be an audience of one, but I'd still enjoy it.
no subject
Date: 28/11/19 16:02 (UTC)Writing TF meta is sometimes hard b/c I feel like I'm one poor turn of phrase away from being a Functionist all but in name.
no subject
Date: 29/11/19 02:42 (UTC)no subject
Date: 29/11/19 14:17 (UTC)I think the biggest generalisation you can make is that you can't attribute the qualities of a group to an individual, even while you can use an individual to read a group, and that values are communal rather than categorical, but these are also true for humans |D And similarly, I think I could theoretically define a set of physical qualities and be like "100% of mecha have 90% of these qualities" and have it be kinda-sorta in the ballpark of not being horribly offensive.
no subject
Date: 30/11/19 21:07 (UTC)Yep, there's a lot of reasons it's a post I'd rather read than write :D Just having the complications laid out like that is enough to make me want to go back to fiction. It's a good topic, though. Social Theory is fascinating to me, from a distance.
no subject
Date: 30/11/19 22:04 (UTC)At least when I'm writing fic with characters, I can always just be like "you don't have to agree with my characterisation but my reasoning stands in the text for you to see". Here I'm kinda just throwing worldbuilding together and praying.
no subject
Date: 4/12/19 04:50 (UTC)