Thank you! I'm glad you like it, this has definitely been useful for me to get my thoughts into order.
I think ultimately I like the idea that Megatronus' patronage was typical of warrior class mecha -- civil protection, enforcers, soldiers -- and his tragedy is often folded into the narrative to provide a counterpoint to the idea that power and affluence are good for their own sake. Megatronus' downfall was at least partially from a lack of community, from being unfettered and not having a sensible goal in mind for all that power he was accumulating. Megatronus, ultimately, is a failed protector. It pairs nicely with the idea that Prima -- and under his patronage, the judges and courts -- is also tragic in his lack of flexibility and being too quick to assume the worst. The failure of communication between them is the result of valuing method over results, essentially. Prima loses his tragic furnishings and becomes more of a righteous vanquisher of deviance and greed in later retellings to fit better with functionist messages about how it was So Sad that the Fallen was not satisfied to serve his purpose as the sword-arm of Primus.
Liege Maximo is also just up and villainised in later retellings as an agitator and a collaborator and is seen as having gotten his dues when Megatronus turned on him, but the narrative probably wasn't originally that clear-cut? After all, self-interest is not inherently evil, and negotiation, strategising and social engineering are useful and necessary skills, not only because assuming that everyone is always acting in good faith means the ones that don't hold themselves to that standard can make a sucker out of everyone else. Liege Maximo going too far is more of a proper old-fashioned cautionary tale.
It might be interesting to envision Liege Maximo and Micronus Prime as sort of... counter-forces. Micronus is the angel to Liege Maximo's devil on one's shoulder, one of them advocating nobility, group-mindedness and principle and the other one gesturing towards self-preservation, utilitarianism and individualism. "Sometimes, it's good to think for yourself" is not a message a functionist high church would want to propagate, either :D
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 22/5/20 21:25 (UTC)I think ultimately I like the idea that Megatronus' patronage was typical of warrior class mecha -- civil protection, enforcers, soldiers -- and his tragedy is often folded into the narrative to provide a counterpoint to the idea that power and affluence are good for their own sake. Megatronus' downfall was at least partially from a lack of community, from being unfettered and not having a sensible goal in mind for all that power he was accumulating. Megatronus, ultimately, is a failed protector. It pairs nicely with the idea that Prima -- and under his patronage, the judges and courts -- is also tragic in his lack of flexibility and being too quick to assume the worst. The failure of communication between them is the result of valuing method over results, essentially. Prima loses his tragic furnishings and becomes more of a righteous vanquisher of deviance and greed in later retellings to fit better with functionist messages about how it was So Sad that the Fallen was not satisfied to serve his purpose as the sword-arm of Primus.
Liege Maximo is also just up and villainised in later retellings as an agitator and a collaborator and is seen as having gotten his dues when Megatronus turned on him, but the narrative probably wasn't originally that clear-cut? After all, self-interest is not inherently evil, and negotiation, strategising and social engineering are useful and necessary skills, not only because assuming that everyone is always acting in good faith means the ones that don't hold themselves to that standard can make a sucker out of everyone else. Liege Maximo going too far is more of a proper old-fashioned cautionary tale.
It might be interesting to envision Liege Maximo and Micronus Prime as sort of... counter-forces. Micronus is the angel to Liege Maximo's devil on one's shoulder, one of them advocating nobility, group-mindedness and principle and the other one gesturing towards self-preservation, utilitarianism and individualism. "Sometimes, it's good to think for yourself" is not a message a functionist high church would want to propagate, either :D